Show simple item record

dc.creatorMorton, Edward Ethan
dc.date.accessioned2007-03-27T23:59:13Z
dc.date.available2007-03-27T23:59:13Z
dc.date.issued1/1/1984 0:00
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2376/769
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A.), Anthropology, Washington State Universityen_US
dc.description.abstractThe primary objective of this study is to examine settlement patterns on Cedar Mesa within five canyons during the late Pueblo II and Pueblo III periods (ca A.D. 1060-1270). The secondary objective is to compare results with settlement patterning in the larger drainage basins of which the canyons represent a small but environmentally distinctive part. This thesis explores the relative strength and degree to which several variables affect settlement patterns. I use this study to address some fundamental questions: Why did prehistoric peoples place their settlements where they did? Is there any difference in the locations of settlements between the physiographic zones of the canyons and the mesa tops? Did settlement patterns change within the late Pueblo II and Pueblo III periods?Data were gathered from 139 late Pueblo II and Pueblo period archaeological sites from five canyons on Cedar Mesa. A subset of 32 sites were assigned to one of four chronological phases (Windgate, Clay Hills, Woodenshoe, Red House). All sites were assigned to two functional categories-habitation or storage. Sites classified as habitations were further subdivided into large and small categories. Utilizing these chronological and functional categories, sites were compared using six variables: site density, artifact assemblages, elevation, distance to drainage channel, exposure, and defense features.The major observations of the analysis are 1)Habitation is emphasized in the northern canyons while storage is emphasized in the southern canyons. 2)Sites are concentrated at the higher elevations near the heads and rims and more spatially dispersed at low elevations. 3)Exposures are predominantly southern. 4)Defensive features are concentrated in high resource areas. 4)Besides a higher density of storage sites, canyon settlement is similar to mesa top settlement. 5)Through time there is an increasing emphasis on the canyon environments culminating in the final phase of occupation. This may be due to increasing levels of conflict in the region as all dated defensive features are from this final phase.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Anthropology, Washington State Universityen_US
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess
dc.subjectCedar Mesa (San Juan County, Utah)en_US
dc.subjectSoutheastern Utahen_US
dc.subjectSettlement patternsen_US
dc.subjectPueblo II and Pueblo IIIen_US
dc.subjectArchaeologyen_US
dc.titleLate Pueblo II and Pueblo III Canyon Settlement Patterns at Cedar Mesa, Southeastern Utahen_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Cedar Mesa Research Materials
    This collection includes theses, dissertations, publications, presentations, and other research materials related to the Cedar Mesa Project managed by William (Bill) Lipe and R.G. Matson.

Show simple item record